QH180 Bamboo Airways - Flight Status

Which is the frequency of flight QH180?
The flight QH180 is scheduled to flight on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday on a weekly basis.

Which is the distance of flight QH180?
The distance between the two airports is 606 kilometers.

Which is the flight time of flight QH180?
The scheduled flight time gate to gate is: 01:25 hours.
The real flight time gate to gate on average is: 01:20 hours.

Are the departure airport and arrival airport at the same Time Zone?
Yes, both airports are in the same timezone.

The following airlines serves the same route between Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang:

Bamboo Airways
- Flight Number: QH154. (On Time performance: 88 - Average Delay: 7 minutes)
- Flight Number: QH162. (On Time performance: 88 - Average Delay: 5 minutes)
- Flight Number: QH170. (On Time performance: 77 - Average Delay: 19 minutes)
- Flight Number: QH186. (On Time performance: 74 - Average Delay: 28 minutes)

Vietravel Airlines
- Flight Number: VU672. (On Time performance: 83 - Average Delay: 35 minutes)
- Flight Number: VU680.

VietJet Air
- Flight Number: VJ1620.
- Flight Number: VJ1622. (On Time performance: 76 - Average Delay: 17 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ1630. (On Time performance: 55 - Average Delay: 30 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ1632. (On Time performance: 10 - Average Delay: 97 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ1634. (On Time performance: 28 - Average Delay: 92 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ1638. (On Time performance: 40 - Average Delay: 43 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ622. (On Time performance: 83 - Average Delay: 12 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ624. (On Time performance: 17 - Average Delay: 86 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ628. (On Time performance: 51 - Average Delay: 32 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ630. (On Time performance: 47 - Average Delay: 45 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ634. (On Time performance: 52 - Average Delay: 40 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ636. (On Time performance: 32 - Average Delay: 64 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ642. (On Time performance: 16 - Average Delay: 75 minutes)
- Flight Number: VJ644. (On Time performance: 25 - Average Delay: 49 minutes)

Vietnam Airlines
- Flight Number: VN106. (On Time performance: 96 - Average Delay: 3 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN110. (On Time performance: 93 - Average Delay: 4 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN112. (On Time performance: 83 - Average Delay: 6 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN114. (On Time performance: 87 - Average Delay: 6 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN118. (On Time performance: 81 - Average Delay: 10 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN122. (On Time performance: 87 - Average Delay: 7 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN126. (On Time performance: 66 - Average Delay: 20 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN130. (On Time performance: 52 - Average Delay: 21 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN134. (On Time performance: 76 - Average Delay: 22 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN136. (On Time performance: 43 - Average Delay: 50 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN138. (On Time performance: 38 - Average Delay: 23 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN140. (On Time performance: 39 - Average Delay: 42 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN142. (On Time performance: 51 - Average Delay: 32 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN146. (On Time performance: 59 - Average Delay: 25 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN148. (On Time performance: 66 - Average Delay: 22 minutes)
- Flight Number: VN6030.
- Flight Number: VN6032.
- Flight Number: VN6034.

We have gathered data from recent months and present below an analysis of how timely the flights have been.

Delays analyzed by Weekday: We have gathered available data from last six months, spanning from October 28, 2024 to November 18, 2024. Next, you can observe the results broken down by day of the week: number of flights analyzed, on-time performance per day, and average delay per day.

Note: We have excluded some days from the graph, since the quantity and quality of the data is not representative enough.

Delays analyzed by Month: It is not possible to calculate the On-Time Performance for this flight accurately by month due to insufficient or non-representative data, as doing so could lead to misleading conclusions